How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2006 Importance of sediment deposition and denitrification for nutrient retention in floodplain wetlands
Harry Olde Venterink, Jan E. Vermaat, Mario Pronk, Frank Wiegman, Guda E. M. van der Lee, Martin W. van den Hoorn, L. W. G(Bert) Higler, Jos T. A. Verhoeven
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Questions: Various floodplain communities may differ in their relative abilities to influence water quality through nutrient retention and denitrification. Our main questions were: (1) what is the importance of sediment deposition and denitrification for plant productivity and nutrient retention in floodplains; (2) will rehabilitation of natural floodplain communities (semi-natural grassland, reedbed, woodland, pond) from agricultural grassland affect nutrient retention?

Location: Floodplains of two Rhine distributaries (rivers IJssel and Waal), The Netherlands.

Methods: Net sedimentation was measured using mats, denitrification in soil cores by acetylene inhibition and bio-mass production by clipping above-ground vegetation in winter and summer.

Results: Sediment deposition was a major source of N and P in all floodplain communities. Highest deposition rates were found where water velocity was reduced by vegetation structure (reedbeds) or by a drop in surface elevation (pond). Sediment deposition was not higher in woodlands than in grassland types. Denitrification rates were low in winter but significantly higher in summer. Highest denitrification rates were found in an agricultural grassland (winter and summer) and in the ponds (summer). Plant productivity and nutrient uptake were high in reedbeds, intermediate in agricultural grasslands, ponds and semi-natural grasslands and very low in woodlands (only understorey). All wetlands were N-limited, which could be explained by low N:P ratios in sediment.

Conclusions: Considering Rhine water quality: only substantial P-retention is expected because, relative to the annual nutrient loads in the river, the floodplains are important sinks for P, but much less for N. Rehabilitation of agricultural grasslands into ponds or reedbeds will probably be more beneficial for downstream water quality (lower P-concentrations) than into woodlands or semi-natural grasslands.

Harry Olde Venterink, Jan E. Vermaat, Mario Pronk, Frank Wiegman, Guda E. M. van der Lee, Martin W. van den Hoorn, L. W. G(Bert) Higler, and Jos T. A. Verhoeven "Importance of sediment deposition and denitrification for nutrient retention in floodplain wetlands," Applied Vegetation Science 9(2), 163-174, (1 December 2006). https://doi.org/10.1658/1402-2001(2006)9[163:IOSDAD]2.0.CO;2
Received: 9 December 2004; Accepted: 1 September 2005; Published: 1 December 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
nitrogen
Nutrient limitation
phosphorus
River water quality
Riverine wetland
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top